W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #305 Header ordering

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:04:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV_4DWyvYtJbeoXzkqcqgqPD1TKKHNsDPA-_oX+sEM2ug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 November 2013 14:59, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> I suspect we'll both remain biased towards each of #1 and #3.
> Thankfully, in either case the marginal difference is small and both #1 and
> #3 are substantially better than #2.

Yep.  Time for RFC 3929 procedures.  No sense in restricting all the
fun in RTCWEB to just that group.
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 23:04:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC