W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt

From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 06:39:06 +0200
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20131120043906.GC3569@LK-Perkele-VII>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:52:57PM -0800, James M Snell wrote:

> Also, keep in the mind the CONNECT tunnel option. One could negotiate
> an agreement and use that along with a CONNECT tunnel. Once that's
> done, any traffic that passes back and forth within that tunnel would
> be protected, limiting potential leakage. If we add incremental
> integrity checking to the picture, this becomes more reliable (albeit
> more complex as well).

How would that work? CONNECT is essentially TCP stream carried within
HTTP/2 mux.

-Ilari
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 04:39:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC