W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:37:46 -0400
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range.all@tools.ietf.org, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <A2D74D42-CF62-4D7E-8E4E-8221F80DCA1D@apple.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Add a forward reference to the boilerplate after the uppercase word?


On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:57 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2013-10-30 08:46, S Moonesamy wrote:
>> ...
>>> Such as?
>> 
>> What I mean is that what happens is undefined when both sides do not
>> follow the RFC 2119 "should".
> 
> The response is self-descriptive, so it's up to the client to properly process it.
> 
>>> It is supposed to be interpreted per RFC 2119.
>> 
>> It is better to use the uppercase words after the RFC 2119 boilerplate.
> 
> But then, we don't want the boilerplate to be in front of the Introduction. Any *concrete* suggestion how to address this?
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 12:38:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:18 UTC