W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:24:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNd9L43756674DCw1uoMOyQME3BKK3mwrzRS+K=gyj67_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
A workable alternative to what we have today should, when deployed widely,
achieve success rates no lower than what we experience today.
Proposing such an alternate mechanism would be constructive.
Until such is proposed, there is no means to 'fix it'!

-=R


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> wrote:

>  On 11/14/2013 12:25 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
>
> As I seem to be saying over and over...
>
> Then stop. We understand that the internet is broken. The real debate
> about that is whether we should work around the breakage by using encrypted
> tunnels for everything, or fix it.
>
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 07:24:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC