Re: Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet from Matthew Kerwin on 2013-11-20 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:27:30 +1000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CACweHNAPdKegZZniw3zcYPATnjYuN-XCoboRAL_GcpDfitScDQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 20 November 2013 13:07, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Hi Matthew,
>
> So, to be clear, you'd be OK with a separate Informational RFC called
> something like "HTTP/2.0 for Web Browsers" or "HTTP/2.0 for the Open Web"
> or similar, even if that spec constrained (or eliminated) using HTTP/2.0
> for http:// URLs?
>

Yes.  I want to see HTTP/2.0 progressed, I don't want it to get bogged down
in debates about deployment policy recommendations/mandates.  If that
separate discussion eventually results in consensus, then so be it,
whatever it may say; and if it changes over time, even better.

> Thanks,

No problem.

-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 03:27:58 UTC