W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: RFC1918 + localhost

From: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:02:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CACuKZqEF2Nc+hvPibMgUUnDQ=3VwzdLG0Smvr09WUhTYU62fWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> But in many ways we don't have choice today.
> If you are advocating for choice where both the client and any entity the
> client connects to explicitly (potentially a proxy) can opt-in or opt-out of
> encryption, then I'm with you.
> If you are advocating for choice where the user and connected-entity get no
> say in the matter, then I'm firmly in the not-interested camp.

So you would rather leave them in the HTTP/1 world?

>
> -=R
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
>> To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
>> Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
>> Sent: 20/11/2013 9:20:59 a.m.
>> Subject: Re: RFC1918 + localhost
>>>
>>> In message <em8b9ccf82-905d-4929-8c41-41362b024e61@bodybag>, "Adrien de
>>> Croy" w
>>> rites:
>>>
>>>> we need to forget about using this as a demarcation for allowability of
>>>> plaintext or not.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd say we need to stop this charade about us being in a position
>>> to tell people where and when they can use plaintext...
>>>
>>> Are you really trying to reintroduce TLS with "NULL" crypto again ?
>>
>>
>> Me?  no, nor did I ever.  That would be a waste of RTTs.
>>
>> I'm advocating choice.  Like we currently have.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>>> phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>>> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
>>> incompetence.
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 22:02:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC