W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:18:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7RbdSqdb8Pf0QnOJ6k=wJeUOFFKG8BGd_=ULCqgFWZLFLEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
It exists because (a) I couldn't come up with any viable, non theoretical
use cases where other attributes would really matter and (b) the current
model works in practice for everything I've done with it.
On Nov 5, 2013 5:13 PM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2013-11-06 02:06, James M Snell wrote:
>
>> Give me a viable, non theoretical use case where the other target
>> attributes and extension parameters would make a difference and I'll
>> reconsider that constraint.
>> ...
>>
>
> I'll try, but in the meantime it would be good if you could explain why
> the constraint is there in the first place :-)
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 01:19:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC