W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #305 Header ordering

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:59:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUe7=5THq9=ebFdD4iL4LHk+6UPD9+wCCrB-Jeo2J-vnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
On 21 November 2013 19:37, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> To be clear - what makes me somewhat comfortable with this approach is that the default is that order is preserved; only if you know that ordering *is* insignificant are you allowed to break it up.

That is my sense too.  I think that Roberto and I are in complete
agreement about this.  The point of disagreement is the delimiter
character.  Not quite a bike shed, but that's where I'd like the
attention focused :)
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 18:00:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC