W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: 2014 Meeting planning

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:15:48 +1100
Cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9F486FF2-AFA6-4669-AB82-F81E47F3014B@mnot.net>
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Yes.... there are indeed many things for us to remember. Thanks for the reminder.


On 5 Dec 2013, at 4:13 pm, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:

> Please also remember that in the IETF, meetings don't decide anything. Confirmation on the mailing list will always be needed.
> 
> Regards,   Martin.
> 
> On 2013/12/05 11:53, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Really hard to tell, but my instinct is that if things go well, we'll be able to nail down some general agreements / approaches in Zurich, but we'll need to refine and incorporate them going forward.
>> 
>> Generally, the feedback I'm getting so far is that we want to keep the pace up and deliver on schedule, which favours tight meetings like this (regardless of the exact topics).
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 5 Dec 2013, at 1:51 pm, William Chan (陈智昌)<willchan@chromium.org>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Is it unreasonable to hope that we'll "mostly" wrap up the security discussions in Zurich? I feel that there are plenty of people who are primarily interested in those discussions, and it'd be a shame to require them to attend multiple interims.

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 05:16:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:20 UTC