W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: I revised the pro/contra document

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:48:30 +0100
Message-ID: <c9ae72296ed102e65acf1510b4039036.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Eliot Lear" <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, "Mike Bishop" <michael.bishop@microsoft.com>, "Alexandre Anzala-Yamajako" <anzalaya@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Le Lun 25 novembre 2013 07:39, Eliot Lear a écrit :

Hi,

> A reasonable answer to all of this is for printers to stick with
> HTTP/1.1.  Another reasonable approach would be to develop specific
> solutions for this use case.

Really, haven't the past decade pretty much proved people did not want
one-of-a-kind protocols? http/1 success is that it was good enough for
everyone. http/2 should aim for the same sweet spot, not terrific for some
and useless for others

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 09:49:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC