W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:57:39 +1100
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2E60B7F7-3A56-4134-9982-6F66F0C706A3@mnot.net>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@gmail.com>

On 21/11/2013, at 12:12 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@gmail.com> wrote:

> If there is a good way to indicate that the first two definitions are end states, but the latter two are processes, that would be great.


Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 03:57:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC