W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: something I don't get about the current plan...

From: Grahame Grieve <grahame@healthintersections.com.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:16:05 +1100
Message-ID: <CAG47hGbdgC_T6xCs4=K3gsKzMcN_dMuKjE15k=Zi5vnbto0ncw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> I'm wondering what people (both sides) would think if we allowed http/2 for http:// URLs (with or without opp encryption) for .local and RFC1918 addresses, to ease the IoT / printer cases.

+1. Allow no encryption in these cases

I like encryption everywhere else personally, but would have a problem
if there was no exception for local devices.

Grahame
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 04:16:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC