W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources

From: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 11:58:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CANmPAYE22_EKzhHp9Lc-uB07LaVDy87pxjOjiN_2P=sSb64YBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Proxies need consistency so they don't have to behave one way for one web
browser and another way for another web browser, much like the days when
IE6 incompatibilities required multiple implementations of web pages to
work across browsers.

Peter


On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 3 November 2013 09:41, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Any reason this clarification shouldn't be incorporated into the spec?
> Seems
> > an important detail to the server push implementation that we'd want to
> make
> > consistent across all browsers.
>
> I don't see any real need for consistency there.  I'm sure that all
> the browsers will do what makes the most sense within the constraints
> of their architectures.
>
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2013 19:59:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC