W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: I ran across this while working on the spec.

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:39:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_idvHZtH54gjxxy3b3ByiKWJ=OJm-qZPJmP=5BkXPft+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 17 October 2013 11:17, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Lets call this #6.
>
> For #6, I think that you want to allow indexed representations to use
> the static set, otherwise you don't get to take advantage of the
> values there, just the keys.  You might say, however, that indexing
> these doesn't add them to the reference set.
>
>
Yep, that's why you'd lose some compression efficiency for the first time
you sent "http", "GET", "/" or "POST". After which these would be indexible
at the front of the table.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 19:39:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:18 UTC