W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra

From: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 12:58:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CABaLYCvJ8wG9k6kJpxrnEX4EGBVHh2J1XLPwJFH_+n+Q=JbQSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, httpbis mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> In message <5c8i891ufcgcljeblec314pm868deph6h6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>,
> Bjoer
> n Hoehrmann writes:
> >I understood the comment as saying that the point does not belong on
> >a "pro and contra" list, which seems fair enough in this instance.
> Why is having your protocol banned in USA or China not a "con" ?

TLS has not been banned in either China nor the USA.  You claim there is a
"risk" of that, but that's just an opinion, and not one we'll ever likely
agree on.

So, for this list, I was recommending we stick to objective criteria.


> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 20:59:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC