W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option.

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:17:56 +0100
Message-ID: <6c0e3d4effb94f1c42d12187f55003b9.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Le Ven 15 novembre 2013 20:55, Phillip Hallam-Baker a écrit :

> Now that we are going to be going for preventing pervasive surveillance, I
> think we should add a Message Layer Security scheme to HTTP to complement
> TLS.

Indeed that would be a good middle ground as a lot of the filtering in
corps-space only cares about urls (both to block slacker-sites and the url
signatures of zombie networks)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 20:18:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:19 UTC