- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:02:28 +0100
- To: "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Bruce Perens" <bruce@perens.com>, "Ryan Hamilton" <rch@google.com>, "David Morris" <dwm@xpasc.com>, "James Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Le Ven 15 novembre 2013 08:25, Roberto Peon a écrit : > You are saying that we should use a port other than :443 for https > traffic? > ... why? > What backdoor are we talking about? I'm saying that your whole problem with intermediaries in clear stems directly from your attempts to push a new different protocol on a port already used for something else (ie trying to enter through the back-door like a juvenile delinquent because the guard on the main entry may object, ensuring that he will consider you a suspicious character) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 16:03:10 UTC