w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from October to December 2000 by date

Sunday, 31 December 2000

• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? Aaron Swartz
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup -the other side Lisa Seeman

Saturday, 30 December 2000

• Re: Accessibility vs. consideration X: how to handle Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? Kynn Bartlett
• Accessibility vs. consideration X: how to handle Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example Al Gilman
• Re: Checkpoint 5.2 Al Gilman
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup Sean B. Palmer
• WCAG MarkUp Logo Uploaded Sean B. Palmer
• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example Alan J. Flavell
• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup Sean B. Palmer
• the logo again Lisa Seeman
• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup Lisa Seeman
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Checkpoint 5.2 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Al Gilman
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Al Gilman
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example Anne Pemberton
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton

Friday, 29 December 2000

• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example Marti
• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example Al Gilman

Saturday, 30 December 2000

• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example Anne Pemberton

Friday, 29 December 2000

• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) William Loughborough
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) William Loughborough
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Marti
• RE: Checkpoint 5.2 Jim Thatcher
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Leonard R. Kasday
• Checkpoint 5.2 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Al Gilman
• ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example Al Gilman
• Conformance Logo in Markup Sean B. Palmer
• Rationale for using RGB Values? Sean B. Palmer
• RE: local copies of WAI logo Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Jason White
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 28 December 2000

• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May

Friday, 29 December 2000

• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 28 December 2000

• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Matt May
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) William Loughborough
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Anne Pemberton
• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: media: I withdraw my bevocal complaint Al Gilman
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) Al Gilman
• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? Al Gilman

Wednesday, 27 December 2000

• Re: CSS logo Kynn Bartlett
• CSS logo Lisa Seeman

Tuesday, 26 December 2000

• RE: local copies of WAI logo Bailey, Bruce
• Re: local copies of WAI logo Kynn Bartlett
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• Re: SUMMARY expands on CAPTION or TITLE _as required_ Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• Question on abbreviations (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: local copies of WAI logo Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 25 December 2000

• Re: Indexing Matt May
• Re: Indexing Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Indexing Matt May
• Re: Indexing Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Indexing Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Indexing William Loughborough
• Re: Indexing Matt May
• Re: local copies of WAI logo Matt May
• Merry Christmas Anne Pemberton
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use Kynn Bartlett
• Re: local copies of WAI logo Kynn Bartlett
• Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Indexing Anne Pemberton

Sunday, 24 December 2000

• Re: Getting Old Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Getting Old William Loughborough
• Re: Getting Old William Loughborough
• Re: Getting Old Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Getting Old Marti
• Re: Getting Old Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Getting Old William Loughborough
• Getting Old Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Indexing William Loughborough
• Re: Indexing Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Indexing William Loughborough
• Re: Indexing Marti
• Re: Indexing Anne Pemberton
• Re: Indexing Kynn Bartlett
• Guidelines vs standards wasRE: Checkpoint on testability Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: WCAG Conformance Requirements Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Usecase for Testability/Compliance Claims William Loughborough

Saturday, 23 December 2000

• Re: Indexing Sean B. Palmer
• Usecase for Testability/Compliance Claims Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Indexing Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint on testability jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Checkpoint on testability jonathan chetwynd
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Indexing Charles McCathieNevile
• Indexing William Loughborough
• Objective checkpoints RE: Checkpoint on testability Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Anne Pemberton
• RE: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Anne Pemberton
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett

Friday, 22 December 2000

• RE: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett

Saturday, 23 December 2000

• RE: Checkpoint on testability Anne Pemberton

Friday, 22 December 2000

• RE: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• WCAG Conformance Requirements Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Charter suggestion [was Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Charter suggestion [was Checkpoint on testability Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Anne Pemberton
• RE: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Def: Data Model Al Gilman
• RE: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 21 December 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• RE: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Checkpoint on testability Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• Re: Def: Data Model Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Basic Access Principles for Electronic and Information Technologies Anne Pemberton
• Re: Basic Access Principles for Electronic and Information Technologies William Loughborough
• Doug Wakefield speaks on the new 508 guidelines Gregg Vanderheiden
• Basic Access Principles for Electronic and Information Technologies Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Checkpoint on testability Kynn Bartlett
• Re: SVG Plugin from Adobe Mike Williams

Thursday, 21 December 2000

• Re: Checkpoint on testability William Loughborough
• Checkpoint on testability Leonard R. Kasday
• Minutes from 21 December 2000 WCAG WG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Def: Data Model Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: local copies of WAI logo Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets Sean B. Palmer
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• Regrets for Today's Call Marshall Jansen
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• Regrets for Today's Call Kynn Bartlett
• Sayings of "Saints" William Loughborough
• RE: Section 508 Standards are available Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Section 508 Standards are available Robert Neff
• FW: Section 508 Standards are available Gregg Vanderheiden
• Agenda Jason White

Wednesday, 20 December 2000

• Re: local copies of WAI logo Sean B. Palmer
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• Re: local copies of WAI logo Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe William Loughborough
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Kynn Bartlett
• Re: local copies of WAI logo Sean B. Palmer
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• RE: local copies of WAI logo Kynn Bartlett
• RE: local copies of WAI logo Cynthia Shelly
• RE: local copies of WAI logo Kynn Bartlett
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Kynn Bartlett
• RE: local copies of WAI logo Leonard R. Kasday
• Fw: Test cases for images of text. Lisa Seeman
• Pertinent Sagacity? William Loughborough
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe Bailey, Bruce
• RE: local copies of WAI logo Al Gilman
• SUMMARY expands on CAPTION or TITLE _as required_ Al Gilman

Tuesday, 19 December 2000

• Re: SVG Plugin from Adobe Kynn Bartlett
• SVG Plugin from Kynn Bartlett

Wednesday, 20 December 2000

• Re: Some stats on browsers in use Anne Pemberton

Tuesday, 19 December 2000

• regrets for 12/21 and 12/28 Cynthia Shelly
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use Marti
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use Kynn Bartlett
• Re: the text in images issue Matt May
• Re: New guideline needed: user agent independence Sean B. Palmer
• New guideline needed: user agent independence Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: the text in images issue William Loughborough
• Re: the text in images issue Matt May
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use Charles McCathieNevile
• Some stats on browsers in use Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: local copies of WAI logo Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: the text in images issue Lisa Seeman

Monday, 18 December 2000

• Re: Test cases for images of text. Kynn Bartlett
• RE: local copies of WAI logo Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Test cases for images of text. William Loughborough
• Test cases for images of text. Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: local copies of WAI logo by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• Example of Three labeled buttons[was "the text in images issue"] Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: local copies of WAI logo William Loughborough
• Re: local copies of WAI logo Kynn Bartlett
• Re: the text in images issue William Loughborough
• local copies of WAI logo Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: the text in images issue Matt May
• RE: the text in images issue William Loughborough
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Access Board and government regulations Charles McCathieNevile
• Access Board and government regulations Jon Gunderson
• RE: the text in images issue Bailey, Bruce
• RE: the text in images issue William Loughborough
• ALT with INPUT Ricardo Sánchez
• RE: the text in images issue Bailey, Bruce

Sunday, 17 December 2000

• Re: http://www.open.gov.uk (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: redundant alt text Kynn Bartlett
• redundant alt text Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 Robert Neff

Saturday, 16 December 2000

• http://www.open.gov.uk (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] Kynn Bartlett
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• RE: the text in images issue Anne Pemberton

Friday, 15 December 2000

• RE: the text in images issue Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: the text in images issue [was: errata...] Sean B. Palmer
• Februrary all W3C meeting Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] Kynn Bartlett
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] Kynn Bartlett
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] William Loughborough
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) Anne Pemberton
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) Anne Pemberton
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 William Loughborough
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) William Loughborough
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) Kynn Bartlett
• Conformance in WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) William Loughborough
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 14 December 2000

• Minutes from 14 December 2000 WCAG WG Wendy A Chisholm
• universal design of 'next' button Al Gilman
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) Al Gilman
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Leonard R. Kasday
• Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Regrets Kynn Bartlett
• Regrets Sean B. Palmer

Wednesday, 13 December 2000

• Agenda Jason White

Tuesday, 12 December 2000

• Checkpoints Appreciated By Web Designers Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Mistake in CSS-TECHS, Section 13 example Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 11 December 2000

• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Jason White
• Mistake in CSS-TECHS, Section 13 example Hank Szeto

Saturday, 9 December 2000

• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Jason White

Friday, 8 December 2000

• RE: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Cynthia Shelly
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Leonard R. Kasday
• Minutes Nov 30, 2000 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Leonard R. Kasday

Thursday, 7 December 2000

• WAI Initiative in New Zealand (2) (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• minutes from today part 1. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• User agent capabilities [was Agenda Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Agenda William Loughborough
• Regrets Sean B. Palmer
• Accessible? I think not! Donovan Hipke

Wednesday, 6 December 2000

• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 Jon Gunderson
• Regrets for This Week Kynn Bartlett
• Agenda Jason White

Saturday, 2 December 2000

• Re: Separating Content and Presentation: Myth? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Separating Content and Presentation: Myth? William Loughborough
• Re: Attack on Macromedia's Support for Accessibility William Loughborough
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Anne Pemberton
• Re: What's presentation? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: What's presentation? Kynn Bartlett
• Separating Content and Presentation: Myth? Kynn Bartlett
• Attack on Macromedia's Support for Accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 Anne Pemberton
• Re: What's presentation? Anne Pemberton

Friday, 1 December 2000

• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 Jon Gunderson
• Re: What's presentation? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 Jon Gunderson
• Re: What's presentation? William Loughborough
• Re: What's presentation? Sean B. Palmer
• What's presentation? Leonard R. Kasday

Thursday, 30 November 2000

• Regrets Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 Charles McCathieNevile
• Rewording of Guideline 2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets Loretta Guarino Reid
• clarification on regrets (previous e-mail) Wendy A Chisholm
• Fwd: [Moderator Action] Regrets for 30 Nov. and 7 Dec. Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from ever jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Anne Pemberton
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 29 November 2000

• Re: Assertion "tool" Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Assertion "tool" Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Wendy A Chisholm

Thursday, 30 November 2000

• RE: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 29 November 2000

• Re: Assertion "tool" Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 30 November 2000

• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 29 November 2000

• Re: Assertion "tool" William Loughborough
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Cynthia Shelly
• RE: Accessibility of SMIL 2.0 William Loughborough
• Re: Process Kynn Bartlett
• Re: yes/no on image text Kynn Bartlett
• Process William Loughborough
• Re: Browser characteristics Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• RE: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Lisa Seeman
• Re: The fourth element? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• Re: Browser characteristics William Loughborough
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Anne Pemberton
• FW: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Lisa Seeman
• RE: Browser characteristics Lisa Seeman
• Browser characteristics Cynthia Shelly
• Re: yes/no on image text Bruce Bailey
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• Re: The fourth element? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• Re: yes/no on image text Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Proposal for guideline 1 Anne Pemberton

Tuesday, 28 November 2000

• Re: The fourth element? Jason White

Wednesday, 29 November 2000

• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from ever Anne Pemberton

Tuesday, 28 November 2000

• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• The fourth element? William Loughborough
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• yes/no on image text William Loughborough
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text William Loughborough
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• Proposal for guideline 1 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Proposal: delete 3.4 and 3.9 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Proposal: delete 3.4 and 3.9 Lisa Seeman
• RE: Structure Again! (not again ;) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Structure Again! (not again ;) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Structure Again! Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from ever Jon Gunderson
• Re: Proposal: delete 3.4 and 3.9 William Loughborough
• Proposal: delete 3.4 and 3.9 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Structure Again! (not again ;) Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Structure Again! (not again ;) Lisa Seeman
• RE: Minutes from ever Lisa Seeman
• Re: Structure Again! Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Structure Again! Anne Pemberton
• Re: Structure Again! Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from ever jonathan chetwynd
• Agenda Jason White
• Re: Minutes from ever Anne Pemberton
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Anne Pemberton
• Re: Structure Again! Anne Pemberton

Monday, 27 November 2000

• Re: Structure Again! Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Structure Again! Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Structure Again! Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Comments on 21 November draft Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Structure Again! Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Structure Again! William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from ever Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from ever Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Structure Again! Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from ever Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Structure Again! Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minutes from ever William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from ever jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Minutes from ever Chuck Hitchcock

Friday, 24 November 2000

• Re: Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} Sean B. Palmer
• Minutes from ever William Loughborough
• Semantically Describing the Semantic Web Anne Pemberton
• RE: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Re: Structure Again! Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Structure Again! William Loughborough
• Re: Structure Again! Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Structure Again! Alan J. Flavell
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Structure Again! Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 23 November 2000

• Structure Again! William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer

Friday, 24 November 2000

• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 23 November 2000

• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Alan J. Flavell
• Re: 21 November 2000 draft of WCAG 2.0 Anne Pemberton
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Comments on 21 November draft William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Comments on 21 November draft Jason White
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 Sean B. Palmer

Wednesday, 22 November 2000

• Re: 21 November 2000 draft of WCAG 2.0 William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• 21 November 2000 draft of WCAG 2.0 Wendy A Chisholm

Thursday, 23 November 2000

• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton

Tuesday, 21 November 2000

• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer

Wednesday, 22 November 2000

• RE: Text on banners William Loughborough
• RE: Text on banners Anne Pemberton
• RE: Text on banners Lisa Seeman
• Review of User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Jason White

Tuesday, 21 November 2000

• Re: Technique: accessible scripts... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• RE: Logos as trademarks Cynthia Waddell
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton

Monday, 20 November 2000

• Use of Summaries as Meta-Data Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16th November WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16th November WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett

Tuesday, 21 November 2000

• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton

Monday, 20 November 2000

• RDF, etc. William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16th November WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16th November WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Technique: accessible scripts... Alan J. Flavell
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Technique: accessible scripts... Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Technique: accessible scripts... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton

Sunday, 19 November 2000

• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton

Saturday, 18 November 2000

• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Model template for techniques? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Kynn Bartlett

Friday, 17 November 2000

• Model template for techniques? Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon William Loughborough
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Anne Pemberton
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Sean B. Palmer

Thursday, 16 November 2000

• Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• I regret my tardiness Cynthia Shelly
• Re: New proposal for 2.3 - still in the works William Loughborough
• Regrets for Telecon Sean B. Palmer
• Regrets Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Some results from testing forms errors Scott Luebking
• Some results from testing forms errors Scott Luebking
• Re: Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} William Loughborough
• Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} Sean B. Palmer

Wednesday, 15 November 2000

• Regrets Again Kynn Bartlett
• New Programme for Physical Education and Training of Physic EIGS Jesús Gazol
• Re: <EMBED> vs. <OBJECT>, Totally lost! Mike Williams
• <EMBED> vs. <OBJECT>, Totally lost! Derek P

Tuesday, 14 November 2000

• Agenda Jason White
• ADV: AFFORDABLE COMPUTER REPAIR & WEBSITE DESIGN the hit factory.net

Monday, 13 November 2000

• New Programme for Physical Education and Training of Physical Condition EIGS Jesús Gazol

Tuesday, 14 November 2000

• Belated Regrets Donovan Hipke

Monday, 13 November 2000

• Request to Join Sean B. Palmer

Sunday, 12 November 2000

• New proposal for 2.3 - still in the works Wendy A Chisholm

Saturday, 11 November 2000

• Reverse the Aging Process 10-20 Years! HGH@isi.fhg.de

Friday, 10 November 2000

• Re: Flash Guidelines review William Loughborough

Thursday, 9 November 2000

• Flash Guidelines review Mike Williams
• typo in Minutes for 09 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Minutes for 09 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets Katie Haritos-Shea
• Regrets Katie Haritos-Shea
• Great article: A Dao of Web Design Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: WAI media Conformance? jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Visual/logical Hebrew, was Re: FW: Irregular fonts and I18N Lisa Seeman
• Checkpoints 4.3 and 6.3 Jason White

Wednesday, 8 November 2000

• Fwd: Semantic Web: RDF Module For XHTML m12n William Loughborough
• Re: Irregular fonts and I18N Ian Jacobs
• Regrets for 9 November Leonard R. Kasday
• Visual/logical Hebrew, was Re: FW: Irregular fonts and I18N Alan J. Flavell
• Structure William Loughborough
• FW: Irregular fonts and I18N Lisa Seeman
• Re: Irregular fonts and I18N Masayasu Ishikawa
• Regrets for 9 November Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Agenda William Loughborough
• Agenda Jason White

Tuesday, 7 November 2000

• RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available Bailey, Bruce
• RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available Alan J. Flavell
• Repaired WCAG 1.0 Techniques documents (6 November drafts) Ian Jacobs
• RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available Bailey, Bruce
• Irregular fonts and I18N (was: RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available) Wendy A Chisholm
• Aside re sounds William Loughborough
• Re: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available Anne Pemberton
• RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available Lisa Seeman
• Re: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available William Loughborough
• 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 6 November 2000

• TonyWorth.com "WORTH A LOOK" Stocknews
• Re: diversity in web UI design Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Sv: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example Leonard R. Kasday
• At last, Herbal V, the all Natural Alternative! v@bsvbb.de

Sunday, 5 November 2000

• Re: JavaScript Alternative Curiosity Charles McCathieNevile
• Our 'Check-In Check-Out' © Software Simplifies Everything! L. Scott Sagnette
• "Estudar na Net" - Ponto de Situa��o cursos@mail.estudar-na.net

Saturday, 4 November 2000

• JavaScript Alternative Curiosity Marti
• At last, Herbal V, the all Natural Alternative! v@bsvbb.de
• "Estudar na Net" - Ponto de Situa��o cursos@mail.estudar-na.net
• Re: WAI media Conformance? Ian Jacobs
• WAI media Conformance? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Reminder: UA last call review William Loughborough

Friday, 3 November 2000

• accessibility jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Removal of SVG? Re: What is SVG? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: FW: Guideline 1.0 jon gunderson
• RE: Does WCAG 1.0 say alternate interfaces are a "last resort"? Bailey, Bruce
• Re: FW: Guideline 1.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: FW: Guideline 1.0 Anne Pemberton
• Re: Removal of SVG? Re: What is SVG? Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 2 November 2000

• FW: Guideline 1.0 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: REMINDER: User Agent Accessibility Guideline in Last Call until 13 November Jason White
• Re: guideline 2 Kynn Bartlett
• Minutes of 2 November 2000 WCAG WG Telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• guideline 2 Lisa Seeman
• REMINDER: User Agent Accessibility Guideline in Last Call until 13 November Jon Gunderson
• Re: diversity in web UI design Kynn Bartlett
• Does WCAG 1.0 say alternate interfaces are a "last resort"? Kynn Bartlett
• Late regrets for 11/2/00 call Andi Snow-Weaver/Austin/IBM
• RE: Sv: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example Cynthia Shelly
• Re: diversity in web UI design William Loughborough
• Re: diversity in web UI design Kynn Bartlett
• Re: diversity in web UI design Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Removal of SVG? Re: What is SVG? Charles McCathieNevile
• Removal of SVG? Re: What is SVG? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Fixed-presentation formats Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: diversity in web UI design Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Sv: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: diversity in web UI design William Loughborough
• FWD about FLASH Anne Pemberton
• 6 Million E-mail Addresses for $79!!! companysales@dallasoffice.com
• Re: diversity in web UI design Kynn Bartlett
• Sv: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example Claus Thøgersen
• Regrets for 11-2 conference call Dick Brown
• RE: What is SVG? Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 1 November 2000

• Macromedia Flash and SVG was: Re: What is SVG? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: diversity in web UI design William Loughborough
• diversity in web UI design Al Gilman
• RE: What is SVG? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• Re: What is SVG? jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Agenda Lisa Seeman
• RE: Guideline/Checkpoint "modifiers" Lisa Seeman
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose Lisa Seeman
• happy halloween from spiderlight.com Jason Hinkin
• Re: Agenda William Loughborough
• RE: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example Cynthia Shelly
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose Cynthia Shelly
• Agenda Jason White
• RE: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example William Loughborough
• RE: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example Cynthia Shelly
• Re: What is SVG? Anne Pemberton

Tuesday, 31 October 2000

• Re: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example William Loughborough
• Multiple interfaces - a concrete example Cynthia Shelly
• Guideline/Checkpoint "modifiers" William Loughborough
• Re: What is SVG? Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: What is SVG? Jon Gunderson
• Re: What is SVG? Anne Pemberton
• Re: What is SVG? Jason White
• What is SVG? Anne Pemberton

Monday, 30 October 2000

• Re: Fixed-presentation formats Charles McCathieNevile
• Fixed-presentation formats Jason White
• Re: Reason Clause (Was RE: Checkpoint 2.3) Ian Jacobs
• US time changes Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Kynn Bartlett
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose William Loughborough
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Al Gilman
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose William Loughborough
• Re: Reason Clause (Was RE: Checkpoint 2.3) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Charles McCathieNevile
• Reason Clause (Was RE: Checkpoint 2.3) Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) William Loughborough
• RE: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose William Loughborough
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose Lisa Seeman
• Third Forward from Wise Women List Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) Robert Neff
• RE: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) Al Gilman

Sunday, 29 October 2000

• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) Jason White
• RE: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Ian Jacobs
• Re: Text on banners Robert Neff
• Re: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Al Gilman
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose William Loughborough
• Re: Text on banners Marti
• Re: Text on banners Anne Pemberton
• Re: Text on banners Marti
• RE: Text on banners Lisa Seeman
• Re: Text on banners Marti
• Text on banners Lisa Seeman
• Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) Lisa Seeman
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Jason White
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Kynn Bartlett
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Al Gilman
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Jason White
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose William Loughborough
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Jason White
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 Jason White
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Kynn Bartlett

Saturday, 28 October 2000

• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Leonard R. Kasday
• Redundant checkpoints? William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint 1.1 William Loughborough
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 Robert Neff
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Checkpoint 1.1 Kynn Bartlett
• Checkpoint 2.3 Jason White
• Checkpoint 1.1 Jason White
• Como Estudar na Internet? secretariado@mail.estudar-na.net
• Re: Flash and WCAG Robert Neff

Friday, 27 October 2000

• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Ian Jacobs
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Al Gilman
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: user-friendly William Loughborough
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Kynn Bartlett
• Re: user-friendly Kynn Bartlett
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Ian Jacobs
• RE: Vanilla Version of checker William Loughborough
• RE: Vanilla Version of checker Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Leonard R. Kasday
• Vanilla Version of checker William Loughborough
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose William Loughborough
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose Marti
• General Exception for Essential Purpose Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: user-friendly William Loughborough
• Re: user-friendly Jason White

Thursday, 26 October 2000

• user-friendly William Loughborough

Friday, 27 October 2000

• RE: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Anne Pemberton
• Re: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 26 October 2000

• 26 October 2000 WCAG WG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Charles McCathieNevile
• 3.1 strawman Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Who provides the stylesheets Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Cynthia Shelly
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference William Loughborough
• Re: Detail on agenda item #4, scope & dependency sections of WCAG WG charter Judy Brewer
• Re: text in images - WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Who provides the stylesheets Leonard R. Kasday
• text in images - WCAG 2.0 Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Cynthia Shelly
• summary of the 8 proposals for checkpoint 3.1 Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Detail on agenda item #4, scope & dependency sections of WCAG WG charter William Loughborough
• Re: Who provides the stylesheets Kynn Bartlett
• Detail on agenda item #4, scope & dependency sections of WCAG WG charter Judy Brewer
• Re: Yet another graphic button with CSS styled text Leonard R. Kasday
• Who provides the stylesheets Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Yet another graphic button with CSS styled text William Loughborough
• Re: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference William Loughborough
• Yet another graphic button with CSS styled text Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will des adopt? -your joking Lisa Seeman
• the "text in images" thread - why it won't work Lisa Seeman
• Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Claus Thøgersen
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: Let's get back to work Leonard R. Kasday
• Agenda Jason White
• Re: Please review: slight modifcation to proposal Ian Jacobs
• Re: CD and Web Accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• raster/vector William Loughborough
• Re: CD and Web Accessibility Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 25 October 2000

• RE: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread William Loughborough
• Re: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* Alan J. Flavell
• RE: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Cynthia Shelly
• Re: Please review: slight modifcation to proposal Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Bailey, Bruce
• Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Ian Jacobs
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Kynn Bartlett
• CD and Web Accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• Let's get back to work William Loughborough
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Kynn Bartlett
• Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread Wendy A Chisholm
• notes from claus from PDF session at F2F Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Bailey, Bruce
• Checkpoint 5.3 (was RE: [media] WAI guidelines yield...) Bailey, Bruce
• Estudar na Internet secretariado@mail.estudar-na.net
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Cynthia Shelly
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Remarks on WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 discussion Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? m. may
• From the WiseWomen List: Reply #2 Kynn Bartlett
• From the Wise-Women List: Reply #1 Kynn Bartlett
• Remarks on WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 discussion Jason White

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Marshall Jansen
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will des igners adopt? Aunspach, Dan A.
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? William Loughborough
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Marshall Jansen
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Anne Pemberton
• RE: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Lisa Seeman
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Lisa Seeman
• text in images Lisa Seeman
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Dan Aunspach
• Dori Smith's Question on Browser Baseline Kynn Bartlett
• Waffles, anyone? William Loughborough

Monday, 23 October 2000

• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Greg Gay
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Anne Pemberton

Monday, 23 October 2000

• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Kynn Bartlett
• Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? Wendy A Chisholm

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

• Sv: 19 October 2000 minutes Claus Thøgersen
• Sv: Logos as trademarks [was Whales, owls, and geezers ] Claus Thøgersen
• browser conformance Claus Thøgersen

Monday, 23 October 2000

• RE: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Logos as trademarks Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Logos as trademarks Leonard R. Kasday
• Free As In Beer Kynn Bartlett
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Cynthia Shelly
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Automatic Language Identification Leonard R. Kasday
• application to join group Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Logos as trademarks Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Anne Pemberton
• Re: Logos as trademarks [was Whales, owls, and geezers ] Charles McCathieNevile
• Hey, check out this band! travis@thirdtry.com
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: the discussion on how to measure conformance Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Waffling? Kynn Bartlett
• 始めまして　オフィス用品をお安く 小林洋文堂
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Alan J. Flavell
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Anne Pemberton

Sunday, 22 October 2000

• Logos as trademarks [was Whales, owls, and geezers ] Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Leonard R. Kasday
• Waffling? William Loughborough
• Re: the discussion on how to measure conformance William Loughborough
• Re: the discussion on how to measure conformance Kynn Bartlett

Monday, 23 October 2000

• the discussion on how to measure conformance Claus Thøgersen

Sunday, 22 October 2000

• Estudar-na.Net - Venha conhecer-nos secretariado@mail.estudar-na.net
• RE: rewrite 1.1 Lisa Seeman
• RE: Baseline capabilities Lisa Seeman
• RE: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Lisa Seeman
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Baseline capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Baseline capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Anne Pemberton

Saturday, 21 October 2000

• Whales, owls, and geezers William Loughborough
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users William Loughborough
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Anne Pemberton
• another way to state conformance Claus Th�gersen
• Sv: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Claus Th�gersen
• Sv: 19 October 2000 minutes Claus Th�gersen
• Sv: 19 October 2000 minutes Claus Th�gersen
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Gregory J. Rosmaita

Friday, 20 October 2000

• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Kynn Bartlett
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Kynn Bartlett
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Kynn Bartlett
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes William Loughborough
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Leonard R. Kasday
• FREE SATELLITE SYSTEM ! ! ! 20870 FREE_Satellite_Dish84621@worldonline.nl
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Leonard R. Kasday
• why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users Gregory J. Rosmaita
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Kynn Bartlett
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Wendy A Chisholm
• New draft of WCAG 2.0 Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: 19 October 2000 minutes Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Glossary and WCAG 2 Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Device Independent Authoring Workshop "proceedings" Daniel Dardailler
• RE: Baseline capabilities Jason White
• Re: Vs: Baseline capabilities Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: 19 October 2000 minutes Gregory J. Rosmaita
• RE: Baseline capabilities Anne Pemberton
• RE: Baseline capabilities Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 19 October 2000

• 19 October 2000 minutes Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Terminology Problem: "Avoid" Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Terminology Problem: "Avoid" Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Courts not bound by section 508 Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: rewrite 1.1 Dick Brown
• RE: Baseline capabilities m. may
• RE: Baseline capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Baseline capabilities William Loughborough
• RE: Baseline capabilities William Loughborough
• Usability Testing of WCAG David Sloan
• RE: Baseline capabilities Anne Pemberton
• Re: Sv: URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary Charles McCathieNevile
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Lisa Seeman
• RE: Baseline capabilities Lisa Seeman
• Sv: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F Claus Thøgersen
• Re: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary Jason White
• Sv: Agenda Claus Thøgersen
• Sv: Vs: Baseline capabilities Claus Thøgersen
• Sv: URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary Claus Thøgersen

Wednesday, 18 October 2000

• RE: URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: rewrite 1.1 William Loughborough
• URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Baseline capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Baseline capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Vs: Baseline capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• Vs: Baseline capabilities Claus Thøgersen

Tuesday, 17 October 2000

• Upcoming Online Course: Designing for Universal Accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• Agenda Jason White
• RE: Baseline capabilities m. may
• RE: Baseline capabilities Dick Brown
• RE: Baseline capabilities Katie Haritos-Shea
• Baseline capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline m. may
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Cynthia Shelly
• RE: consensus (try 2): text in images Cynthia Shelly
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> SDPFSDP@mail.dit.co.kr
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* William Loughborough
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Bailey, Bruce
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline William Loughborough
• Re: Shared Guidelines Glossary Jon Gunderson
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: consensus (try 2): text in images Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Daniel Dardailler
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline m. may
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline William Loughborough
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Anne Pemberton

Monday, 16 October 2000

• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline m. may
• RE: consensus (try 2): text in images Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Hugo Haas
• consensus (try 2): text in images Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Kynn Bartlett
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text Bailey, Bruce
• Shared Guidelines Glossary Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* geoff freed
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Kynn Bartlett
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Kynn Bartlett
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* William Loughborough
• consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: XML and XSLT Versions of Draft WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: XML and XSLT Versions of Draft WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Re: XML and XSLT Versions of Draft WCAG 2.0 Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Glossary and WCAG 2 Charles McCathieNevile
• Ricevi gratis E-BUSINESS M@RKETING! foryou1@libero.it
• From the Halloween Redwood Ghost..for your kids From The Halloween Ghost

Sunday, 15 October 2000

• Earn $50,000 in 90 Days! larry76_4@vitaminic.co.uk

Wednesday, 11 October 2000

• --Find Out ANYTHING About ANYONE!! remizzen@ratt-n-roll.com

Sunday, 15 October 2000

• Would you like to trade links? Sean Proske
• RE: Glossary and WCAG 2 Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

Saturday, 14 October 2000

• Fulfill Your Potential!!! drg@cuthof.se
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• Re: Glossary and WCAG 2 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline William Loughborough
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces Charles McCathieNevile
• Glossary and WCAG 2 Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Cynthia Shelly

Friday, 13 October 2000

• Fwd: Words William Loughborough
• Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces Kynn Bartlett
• Updated open issues list Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Additional issue for alternate interfaces Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Additional issue for alternate interfaces Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Server Side techniques discussion from F2F Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces William Loughborough
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline William Loughborough
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces Charles McCathieNevile
• Remember: Register for the CC/PP Developers Days! (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: list of currently most used abriviations Charles McCathieNevile
• Additional issue for alternate interfaces Kynn Bartlett
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Kynn Bartlett
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline William Loughborough
• My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline Cynthia Shelly
• Server Side techniques discussion from F2F Cynthia Shelly

Thursday, 12 October 2000

• minutes from 12 October 2000 telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: New Book: "Brothers Beware: Games Black Women Play"! Law Library Computer Lab
• Checkpoint mapping between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification William Loughborough
• list of currently most used abriviations Claus Th�gersen
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken William Loughborough
• Re: Navigating an application William Loughborough
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken William Loughborough
• Re: Meta-Guidelines for Markup Language Design Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Meta-Guidelines for Markup Language Design Charles McCathieNevile
• Meta-Guidelines for Markup Language Design Kynn Bartlett
• Re: SVG techniques Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: SVG techniques Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• rewrite 1.1 Lisa Seeman
• Constraint CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? Charles McCathieNevile
• Checkpoints 2.3-2.5, 6.1 and 6.4 Jason White
• Agenda Jason White
• Re: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? Jason White
• device independence authoring wag2 and ua2 Claus Thøgersen

Wednesday, 11 October 2000

• Re: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: SVG techniques Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? Katie Haritos-Shea
• where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Minutes from the F2F meeting Katie Haritos-Shea
• Minutes from the F2F meeting Wendy A Chisholm
• Why we need WCAG 2.0 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F Charles McCathieNevile
• SVG techniques Charles McCathieNevile
• Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F Wendy A Chisholm
• FW: Ligatures in .PDF files. Katie Haritos-Shea
• request to join Claus Thøgersen
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification by way of Al Gilman

Tuesday, 10 October 2000

• FW: Clocks Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification Al Gilman
• 6 Million E-mail addresses for $79!! leslie45_23@weblyte.co.uk

Monday, 9 October 2000

• Request to Join Greg Kihlstrom

Tuesday, 10 October 2000

• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification Anne Pemberton

Monday, 9 October 2000

• Request to Join Greg Kihlstrom
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification Al Gilman
• Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification kynn@idyllmtn.com
• At last, HERBAL V the all natural alternative! rsb@docsj.de

Wednesday, 4 October 2000

• cable services 63426672@yahoo.com

Sunday, 8 October 2000

• Re: Does Britney Spears fart? Anne Pemberton
• WOW!!! Highest Payouts Around!!!!!!!! bubblehead32@hotmail.com

Saturday, 7 October 2000

• RE: Clocks Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• RE: Clocks (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 6 October 2000

• http://www.willing-to-try.com/ jonathan chetwynd
• Does Britney Spears fart? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Clocks Al Gilman
• Re: Clocks Marti
• Re: Clocks Charles McCathieNevile
• Clocks Marti
• Action item on user interfaces Jason White
• Case 5 Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 5 October 2000

• Multiple versions Jason White

Friday, 6 October 2000

• RE: A tithe of pages: towards an animated browsing environment Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 5 October 2000

• Comments on September 28 draft Michael Cooper
• RE: A tithe of pages: towards an animated browsing environment Bailey, Bruce
• Re: A tithe of pages: towards an animated browsing environment Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 4 October 2000

• A tithe of pages: towards an animated browsing environment TITUS SINGH
• Re: proposed agenda for wcag F2F Al Gilman
• proposed agenda for wcag F2F Wendy A Chisholm
• CSS-Techs: Text formatting and position Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 3 October 2000

• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• Request for requirements input for XHTML 2.0 Al Gilman

Monday, 2 October 2000

• RE: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken Al Gilman
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken Marshall Jansen

Friday, 29 September 2000

• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken Marja-Riitta Koivunen

Sunday, 1 October 2000

• TECH-CSS: Use numbers, not names, for colors Bjoern Hoehrmann

Monday, 2 October 2000

• Business & Sales Leads (Trans Continental Technologies :- Business and Sales lead generation software) CTI :-Computer Telephony Integration Trans Continental Technologies

Sunday, 1 October 2000

• UPCOMING ANIMAL CHIROPRACTIC SEMINARS dkamen4492@aol.com
• I was paid $23,625 by a complete stranger! In less than a week... alpha@highnetspeed.com
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken Anne Pemberton
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken Anne Pemberton
• Re: Navigating an application Al Gilman

Last message date: Sunday, 31 December 2000 11:38:38 UTC