- From: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:20:14 -0800
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>
----- Original Message ----- From: "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net> > The "requirements" will be trivially doable. Take a look at > http://uwimp.com and see if you really think this is some severe burden? I'd need to see the requirements, naturally, to agree with you. If all you're trying to do is get WCAG compliance data in a single RDF document on the server, then I apologize for misunderstanding you. I'm afraid I read ahead a few years too far in the RDF history into where metadata is being read and processed by intelligent agent technologies to find data for the user as "indexing". (The word "indexing" cross-references "Index Server" in my head, which is a big mismatch.) Clearly, the time for that is not now, but I can't see a problem with requiring one standalone RDF document for compliance checking, title/author/description (though the "description" field, in the future as today, is bound to be exploited and of diminished value...), and/or site mapping as a P1. I may have issues with embedded meta tags in HTML documents, however. Again, sorry for the confusion. ---- matt
Received on Monday, 25 December 2000 17:20:18 UTC