- From: Bailey, Bruce <Bruce_Bailey@ed.gov>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:42:22 -0500
- To: "'Kynn Bartlett'" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, "'Web Content Accessibility Guidelines'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Jason White'" <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
[snip] > Hmm... I am beginning to believe that we should standardize each > checkpoint with a <benefit>...</benefit> section which would define > what exactly each checkpoint does. I very much like the way how you > have been presenting the usefulness of each, which also helps with > increased perception of the _need_ for each checkpoint. > > This means that for each checkpoint now we would have to insert a > "reason" clause. I think that's doable and in fact I think it is > mandatory. Should this be a separate discussion about document > structure and format? [snip] This would, IMHO, be most welcome. There are a few check points I would love to see the rational for!
Received on Monday, 30 October 2000 08:43:09 UTC