- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 14:04:51 -0800
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 04:30 PM 11/29/00 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>it is only a case of having an annotation that specifically includes the
>bit of RDF you are looking for - that is next on the development agenda.
Since it is on the agenda then we might want to recommend that WCAG 2.0
provide a spot for it in the guidelines?
Specifically that there be a "placeholder" sort of thing that deals with
making a conformance assertion in order to be conformant?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2000 17:05:49 UTC