- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:51:10 -0800
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>, "Marti" <marti@agassa.com>
At 11:22 AM 12/24/2000 , Sean B. Palmer wrote: >So, William, what is it really like to get old? I feel that we often forget >to include "age" as a disability (too young or too old), in much the same >way as Ann steers us in the direction of cognitive disabilities. I think we need to be careful about the terminology here; age (old or young) is not a disability, it's merely a state of being. Disabilities are a state of being as well, but are a specific subset. The arguments for "increased accessibility for people with disabilities" are weakened whenever we adopt a well-meaning principle that makes most people effectively "disabled." For example, if I claimed I was "disabled" because I am about 30 lbs overweight, or because I need glasses to see, or because I never learned how to play the piano, then the definition of disability loses its meaning and power. While that may seem like a good thing -- realizing that we all have varying abilities -- it also serves to engender skepticism in many people who will look at the so-called "disability" and then conclude that most anyone claiming a disability may have as weak a claim as mine. This has been seen before, in the US, when dealing with people who need public support to avoid starving. Because there are visible, but rare, cases of welfare abuse, many people have decided that welfare itself is wrong because all it does is help lazy cheats who want a free ride -- even though the majority of people on the public dole are honest people who simply lack money or the ability to earn it. Now, that's not to say that age isn't a condition we should concern ourselves with -- at Edapta, we consider aged users to be a primary target demographic for our edaptations -- but to declare that the state of being aged is inherently a disability will just confuse the issue. Especially as there are a number of age-related changes which are not "disabling" at all, but rather just simply -differences- (such as cognitive changes related to age) -- and especially as the specific effects of age will vary by person. When someone becomes disabled -- due to age or otherwise -- then clearly they fall into the realm of someone with a disability! Anyway, back to guidelines... --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Sr. Engineering Project Leader, Reef-Edapta http://www.reef.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ Contributor, Special Edition Using XHTML http://kynn.com/+seuxhtml Unofficial Section 508 Checklist http://kynn.com/+section508
Received on Sunday, 24 December 2000 14:57:17 UTC