- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:10:30 -0800
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 07:22 AM 12/20/2000 , Leonard R. Kasday wrote: >I realize I'm using list bandwidth for what may seem to be a micro-issue, but there's at least one company that's genuinely concerned that they do it right, and they want to see permission to copy the logo it in e-writing, not just hear my opinion (or anyone's personal opinion for that matter). We don't want discourage any other companies from using the logo just because they don't want to reference images on another server, especially companies as careful as this one. > >So, my corrected proposal is that we follow the example of the w3c validator and >we issue an erratum that allows people to use local copies of the compliance logos. >Do most people agree and can the others live with that? > >(I'll also happily accept a bilateral dictatorial decision from the chairs <grin/> ) I not only "can live with that", but I couldn't live with the alternative! I think it's clearly an omission and there are a number of excellent reasons for doing what you suggest, Len. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Director of Accessibility, Edapta http://www.edapta.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/ What's on my bookshelf? http://kynn.com/books/
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2000 13:39:10 UTC