RE: Additional issue for alternate interfaces

I like the way it was expresed in Cynthia's checkpoint prposal, although I
think it is worth exapnding on it in the techniques.

Chaals

On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote:

  Guideline 7 perhaps ?? 
  
  -----Original Message-----
  From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On
  Behalf Of William Loughborough
  Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 11:06 AM
  To: Kynn Bartlett; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
  Subject: Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces
  
  
  At 06:56 AM 10/13/00 -0700, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
  >Something which I don't think we are explicit about -- perhaps it belongs 
  >in the server-side techniques document -- is the idea that:
  >
  >      When providing alternate interfaces to web content or
  >      applications, there must be an interface option which is
  >      designed in accordance with universal accessibility
  >      principles.
  
  By Jove, I think you've got it. If fact that's what I thought I was asking 
  for in the previous (perhaps too heated?) exchange. But I think it should 
  be in a more prominent setting than the server-side techniques document.
  
  --
  Love.
                   ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
  
  

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
September - November 2000: 
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Friday, 13 October 2000 12:58:29 UTC