RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will des igners adopt?

I don't think I'm confused at all about the difference between establishing
guidelines and the promotion of those guidelines.  My point, in short, is
that I am concerned over the suggestions of some participants, made as
recently as this week, that the guidelines established here should, in some
instances, be unattainable.  I mentioned my difficulty in getting others to
adopt existing guidelines to illustrate the point that if the guidelines are
set in such a way as to make them impossible to follow, they will not be
adopted.  So, you see, the two are related.  You can spend all the time you
like making guidelines, but if nobody employs them, they aren't serving
their purpose.  
I agree with you that we should not concern ourselves with promotion until
we have guidelines to promote, but I think the essential point that was
missed is that we should seriously consider the consequenses of building a
set of guidelines that may be impossible to implement.
-- Original Message from Lisa Seeman ---
Subject: RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will
designers adopt? 
We seem to be confusing two issues. The dichotomy is as follows, 1)what
should the guidelines be 2)How to promote them. Let as first focus what a
guideline should idealistically be. Then we (and EO) have a separate
question, - how to promote them. We have already discussed ways to make the
accessibly rating gradual, (RTF ...) and although we have not yet hit on a
solution, we will. so lets concentrate on the question. what should the
guideline be. yours,

Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2000 10:44:49 UTC