- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 15:38:36 -0800
- To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough)
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 01:59 PM 12/22/2000 , William Loughborough wrote: >Even though this is in theory doable with just icons, the proposed detailed methods provide a lot more context/confidence/checkability (love that alliteration). I will review the detailed methods again to try to see what you are seeing in them, William. Do you agree that "detailed methods" probably belong in techniques, even if we agree that some sort of compliance verification guideline may be of use to certain users with disabilities? (I think part of my reaction to the proposed checkpoints may have been simply a reaction to the fact that it seemed to mandate one, and only one, solution for the problem.) --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Sr. Engineering Project Leader, Reef-Edapta http://www.reef.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ Contributor, Special Edition Using XHTML http://kynn.com/+seuxhtml Unofficial Section 508 Checklist http://kynn.com/+section508
Received on Friday, 22 December 2000 19:12:44 UTC