- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 10:41:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hmmm. Probably the best way to get the answer is to sift back through old minutes and mail archives which predate the first introduction of the technique. So start sifting back through revisions of the techniques document... The only reason I can think of is that it is theoretically a little easier to deal with color values that are RGB automatically. In particular, there is no need to write the case statement, or array search, that associates a numeric value with colours. Which seems a little tenuous to me. In terms of internationalisation, they are both effectively opaque strings. But then so are the supposedly mnemonic names for most HTML elements (not that "a" ever strikes me as very mnemonic, althoug at least it is easy to write). Any other pearls of wid=sdom (or has someone done the actual research suggested above?) Charles McCN On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Sean B. Palmer wrote: <lang xml:lang="en"> I was asked a question about the rationale for the WCAG CSS Techniques [1] telling people to use qualified colours (RGB values) rather than names. The only reason I could think up was that names aren't as widely supported as RGB values, and you can't get the exact colour that you want. Please note that the Techniques document provides no explanation whatsoever for using RGB rather than a name. I was asked this question about three days ago. It has taken me all that time to realise that I'm on GL, so I only have to raise the point (duh!) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-CSS-TECHS/ The commenter noted that it might be a mistake, but since it was not explained he could not comment further! Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer http://infomesh.net/sbp/ "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07. </lang> -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia until 6 January 2001 at: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Saturday, 30 December 2000 10:41:55 UTC