- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:14:24 -0800
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce_Bailey@ed.gov>
- Cc: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>, "'w3c-wai-gl@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 06:45 AM 12/22/2000 , Bailey, Bruce wrote: >Keep in mind that the stated reason the 508 rules did not embrace more of >the WCAG 1.0 P1 checkpoints is that they were not objective (i.e., testable) >enough. >Do we want to write "guidelines" or "standards"? Do we need to choose? I think we need to choose. Right now we are writing guidelines and acting as if they are standards. WITHOUT PERSONALLY CALLING ANY OF YOU NAMES, that seems wrong-headed and counterproductive to me. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Director of Accessibility, Edapta http://www.edapta.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/ What's on my bookshelf? http://kynn.com/books/
Received on Friday, 22 December 2000 11:32:07 UTC