Waffles, anyone?

Sometimes a re-read locates things missed before. There's just something 
rather vague about:

1.1 "...as necessary..."

2.2 "Where practicable..."

3.3 "...where natural and appropriate."

It's not just "tersification" but also firming of resolve. What in the 
military is called "the voice of command." I think that's all the examples 
of "waffling" in the document. Of course there's still plenty of waffles in 
the text describing the checkpoints and we might consider rooting it out?

I think the word "metadata" should be in some checkpoint (as it is in WCAG 
1.0, checkpoint 13.2), not just in the "explanatory" material.

What (mostly) the editors have achieved here is remarkable: there are 25 
checkpoints compared with 65 in 1.0 - without shorting our intent!

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE

Received on Monday, 23 October 2000 22:30:09 UTC