- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:45:21 -0800
- To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@opendesign.com>
- Cc: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 11:09 AM 12/20/2000 , Cynthia Shelly wrote: >As the one who was concerned about change control, I can live with that, as >long as 1) the logo clearly states WCAG 1.0 (which I think it does), and 2) >when we put up conformance logos for WCAG 2.0, they say WCAG 2.0 and are at >a different URL than the WCAG 1.0 logos. I think that would be required by most W3C policies, yeah. Clearly different logos are needed for different logos of different specifications. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Director of Accessibility, Edapta http://www.edapta.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/ What's on my bookshelf? http://kynn.com/books/
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2000 14:14:13 UTC