- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:50:27 -0800
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, "Anne Pemberton" <apembert@crosslink.net>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 10:34 PM +0000 11/23/00, Sean B. Palmer wrote: >If you're using XHTML as a document display format for text/html groking >User Agents, then fine: add as much presentation and behaviours as you like. >But if you're using XHTML as a data format, containg Semantic information >that a world of SW/XML/RDF processors can understand, then use a future >version of XHTML, and never breathe a word about presentational markup and >attached behaviours. If you're using XHTML as a data format, then it's no wonder you're having problems! XHTML is an awful data format except for a very small set of file types. It's actually grown to be better as a general presentation language than as a general document data format. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Monday, 27 November 2000 14:34:48 UTC