- From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 10:36:19 +0200
- To: "WAI \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I thinking about this again (Maybe I was a bit fed up with the current threads? Did not dare get sucked into it - anyway, someone should propose something ;) Anyway With the current wording, text that does not have a primarily grafical function in a graphic is out. What about a review of the term text and textual content, or adjustment to the word to make it "relevant textual content" in other words, content that is relevant to the aim or a goal of the site, should not be in the form of a graphic, unless that text is of a has a primarily graphical function - I.E. not banners and ads OK the wording sucks. Oh all right, I'll try again 3.1 When an appropriate markup language exists AND WILL WORK, use markup rather than images to convey information TO ALLOW TEXT SCALABILITY. [Priority 2] For example, use SVG for line art, MathML to mark up mathematical equations, and CSS for text-oriented special effects. You may not present relevant textual content as an image, unless the text has a primarily graphical function, and the effect cannot be achieved with markup, (as in the case of some for logos and limited accent elements) provided that you provide a textual equivalent to the content contained in the image. That, with a glossary definition, should take care of annoying banners that no user wants to see. Still could do with a rewrite See U, L -----Original Message----- From: Robert Neff [mailto:robneff@home.com] Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 8:04 PM To: Marti; seeman@netvision.net.il; WAI (E-mail) Subject: Re: Text on banners i am concerned that the words i see proposed are telling designer how to design when thie tools and methodologies work. it is my belief that this is being overthought. banner ads and images that have text are an essential part of the user interface. if i am interpreting the recommended words here correctly to limit text on an image then i think this is not good. then why do we have the ALT tag? i do like the idea to create recommend usage of AD for Advertisement in the ALT tag. we could make this accepted practice. can the desription be out in the longdesc? would be great to have an AD tag. /rob
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 05:33:23 UTC