- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 08:40:40 -0800
- To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough), w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 8:09 AM -0800 11/29/00, William Loughborough wrote: >IOW I feel really bad that we are publicly characterizing WCAG 1.0 >in such inflammatory ways. >All documents will have flaws but the depiction of what resulted >from a process in which so many participated *so effectively* as >"not clear enough" and "poorly edited" while others (such as EOWG) >are trying to use it as our public face is counter-productive. I'm sorry if criticism of WCAG 1.0 is not allowed, even within the working group. I don't, however, consider the working group list discussion to be "public" in nature, and for the most part, I do not go around openly criticizing WCAG 1.0. I understand that some of you have personal investments in WCAG 1.0 thanks to your work, and I am appreciative of the time and energy invested in writing that document. My comments are not meant to inflame nor to make you feel bad. I also apologize to the emperor for the comment about his clothes, too. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2000 12:03:16 UTC