Re: proposed agenda for wcag F2F

Please, as you discuss things, try to surface and capture ideas as to how
better support from the format definition(s), particularly XHTML, would aid
the cause.  Particularly in the opening "reflections on the workshop"
session. 

I don't want discussion of these ideas to take over and consume your
meeting.  But please try to get people to post them to
<wai-tech-comments@w3.org> where they can inform what we tell HTML WG.

Al

At 09:28 AM 2000-10-04 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>Thursday
>8:30-9 breakfast
>9:00-9:30 intros lead into ...
>9:30 -10:30
>Open discussion about reactions to the Device Independent Authoring 
>Workshop to harvest interesting ideas, update those who did not attend, and 
>give those who did attend a chance to digest.
>10:30-10:45 break
>10:45-12:30 Go through edits to recent draft to determine if we should
>· keep as is
>· modify and try again
>Actual discussion of proposed changes will occur in following telecons and 
>discussions on the list. This is just to get a feel for consensus on edits 
>not to bring the group to consensus.
>
>12:30-1:30 lunch
>1:30-3:00 Should we consider XML in this document or keep it separate?
>· KB believes that creating a new language and writing content in a 
>language are two different activities for two different audiences, thus 
>keep them in separate documents.
>· JW believes that these documents and practices are quickly converging.
>Discuss user interface metaphors and how they are influenced by changes in 
>technology like Voice Browsing and XForms. How will we address these 
>metaphors in WCAG 2.0?
>
>3:00-3:30 break
>3:30-5:00 Normative vs. Non-normative (· issue #17 in the issues list). As 
>part of this discussion Kynn will hopefully demonstrate (or at least 
>discuss) using XML/XSLT to generate multiple versions of the document.
>· If multiple versions exist, how does one claim conformance? How do we 
>write the conformance statement?
>· How does one claim conformance on multiple views of documents? How does 
>an author who is generating multiple views determine if they conform?
>· Are technology-specific "checks" normative or non-normative?
>· Gregory and William will present "cyber-ghetto" issues.
>
>Friday
>8:30-9 breakfast
>9:00-10:30 Break into groups to discuss technology-specific techniques. As 
>part of this discussion, consider how we will handle "until user agent" 
>clauses. Can we get rid of? Do we need to state assumptions? Is there some 
>way to say "this is ideally what we'd like but it's not supported yet so in 
>the meantime..."
>10:30-10:45 break
>10:45-12:30 Planning
>· When should we aim to go to last call?
>· When would people like to see a Recommendation?
>· When and where is our next face to face meeting? Volunteers to host?
>· When should we publish working drafts of the techniques that we've 
>discussed?
>· Are people interested in inviting experts in various technologies to 
>present to the group to educate us and for Q&A about how our spec relates 
>to other technologies? e.g., invite a MathML guru to discuss MathML so we 
>can determine how well our draft will cover MathML as well as what 
>techniques we should develop for MathML.
>
>12:30-1:30 lunch
>1:30-3:00 With regards to the afternoon with AU WG: ask them to review WCAG 
>2.0 for dependencies with ATAG 1.0 and discuss how filling out a Web form 
>can be creating Web content.
>3:00-3:30 break
>3:30-5:00
>--
>wendy a chisholm
>world wide web consortium
>web accessibility initiative
>madison, wi usa
>tel: +1 608 663 6346

>/--
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2000 11:28:11 UTC