- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:19:33 -0700
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 11:20 AM 10/1/00 -0400, Al Gilman wrote:
>(in a round of HTML reform discussions that is about to hit you)
A quick thought (I'm amidst reading 1000 emails) from a proposal by Mark
Abrams (UIML) for something that might prove useful in our XHTML reforms: a
<CONTENT> element, perhaps a place-holder to sort of blunt the <OBJECT>
controversy. Since we so often speak of content/structure/style separation
it might help educate authors to be sort of forced to think about what
would go in a "Content" container?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2000 13:20:55 UTC