- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:42:15 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>, Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I prefer to have a clearer statement - do not is proabably a good thing to put in a draft. cheers Chaals On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: I am editing a draft now that gets rid of avoid. In two instances I propose saying, "do not...." However I think this wording is actually too strong, but I want to get people's reactions. --w At 02:01 PM 9/29/00 , William Loughborough wrote: >At 10:32 AM 9/29/00 -0700, Kynn Bartlett wrote: >>The verb "avoid" should be avoided -- er, should NEVER BE USED -- in WCAG >>2.0. >>--Kynn, the guy who nitpicked for "author" vs. "user" in ATAG > >Yep! --William, the guy who joined in Kynn's nitpicking in ATAG. > >Also "ensure" is sort of like "guarantee" and whatever it is that is to be >"ensured" might just as well be "done" - instead of ensuring that blah, >blah it might be better to just blah, blah. > >-- >Love. > ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /-- -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia September - November 2000: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2000 15:42:32 UTC