Sv: Agenda

Hi Jason,

I think the discussion started by Charles on baseline capabilities should be taken up, because we seem to be close onto a workable sollution regarding as I understand it one part of defining what and when a technology can be said to be accessable. It is very close to beeing a UA topic but nobody has suggested moving it to UA.

Claus

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 4:36 PM
Subject: Agenda


> On Thursday, 19 October, 20 hours Coordinated Universal Time (4 PM in
> Boston, 10 PM in France, 7 AM Friday in Eastern Australia), a working
> group teleconference is to be held: +1-617-252-1038
> 
> Agenda
> 
> 1. Checkpoints 2.3, 3.1 and 6.1, as amended in response to issues
> discussed last week. Note that a draft reflecting these changes will be
> published prior to the meeting.
> 
> 2. The proposed checkpoint related to the accessibility of user interfaces
> that control user-specified content selection options.
> 
> 3. Ian's proposal, at the face to face meeting, for a requirement that
> text equivalents (guideline 1) be associated explicitly, in markup or in a
> data model, with the auditory or visual presentations to which they
> provide alternatives. 
> 
> 4. WCAG 1.0 errata to checkpoint 3.1, as discussed on the mailing list.
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2000 18:31:35 UTC