- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:43:34 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 09:41 AM 2000-10-27 -0400, Leonard R. Kasday wrote: > >At any rate, WCAG 1.0 had a guideline 11.4 on alternative accessible pages >that were allowed after the author made "best efforts". If we import that >into WCAG 2.0, how will we word it? > AG:: The "after the author made 'best efforts'" part of that checkpoint is - unenforceably vague - should be considered heuristic, i.e. not a part of the concrete verifiable 'normative' requirements of this checkpoint. And furthermore, - alternate pages can be done well enough so that they do not incur even a P3 violation. They can add a P3-like benefit, as opposed to deficit in usability. [There are both plusses and minuses, potentially, from such a structure.] In other words we should not lay any blanket negative valuation or prohibition on server-side diversity (a.k.a. alternate pages) _per se_. This is cramping the content provider's solution options in a way that is unnecessary and unreasonable. So in WCAG 2 we drop the perjorative tone toward sites with server-side alternatives, and try to extract cleaner descriptions of the true make-or-break and major usability criteria. HOWEVER, all this still comes with a major WARNING that the content provider takes on the burden of ensuring that a) the user knows the alternatives that are available b) the user can get there [into an interaction mode that works for them] and c) it is all kept synchronously up to date. Even if pre-composing a short list of alternatives that the server understands, the content should still be passed over the wire with residual flexibility. The author cannot pre-figure-out all the cases the users will engender. The content providers don't have to cover all user cases with a single 'universal' document or site version. But they still have to be open to some client or middleware manipulation of what they put in each of the server-side alternatives. A few tall poles do not a big tent make. The poles have to be integrated with a flexible fabric. Al
Received on Friday, 27 October 2000 16:17:29 UTC