- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 16:50:17 -0800
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 5:16 PM -0500 12/21/00, Leonard R. Kasday wrote: >Per my action item from last call here's a first cut at a new guideline: > >Guideline X. Design for so that testability can most easily be verified. >Pages should be designed to minimize amount of human effort needed >to confirm accessibility. I find this to be questionable in that it may not be possible in a fully CC/PP-driven, dynamic presentation model. In other words, it may be hard for someone who is not using specific hardware/software/environments/preferences to confirm accessibility for someone who _is_, because different presentations are delivered. This seems a bit like a meta-issue rather than an actual accessibility issue; it doesn't actually affect the accessibility of the content but rather someone's ability to evaluate that accessibility. I am not convinced that those are on the same level of requirement, or even that this -needs- to be included in our guidelines. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2000 19:55:35 UTC