RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available

well done, it looks good.

Some people have told me about some fonts being almost impossible to read.
In fact there was some research were a subgroup of dyslexics found it
extremely hard (or even unable?) to read an irregular font (the letters were
irregular and differently shaped).

I think that this is incorporated in 3.2, but it is not explained. Should it
be a best practice in the techniques.

I am getting absolutely nowhere with a doable BILI technique.

Al the Israeli webhosts I have been talking to have, well, changed the
subject fast.
Open to suggestions.

Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of William Loughborough
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:24 AM
To: Wendy A Chisholm; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available


At 07:56 PM 11/6/00 -0500, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>Latest draft always available at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/

OTOH you've neglected me by not putting a "name" target for the new 1.3
guideline (tsk!).

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE

Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2000 03:08:48 UTC