- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:16:54 -0500
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce_Bailey@ed.gov>
- CC: "'Kynn Bartlett'" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, "'Web Content Accessibility Guidelines'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'Jason White'" <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
"Bailey, Bruce" wrote: > > [snip] > > Hmm... I am beginning to believe that we should standardize each > > checkpoint with a <benefit>...</benefit> section which would define > > what exactly each checkpoint does. I very much like the way how you > > have been presenting the usefulness of each, which also helps with > > increased perception of the _need_ for each checkpoint. This is "the impact matrix" fleshed out... _ Ian > > This means that for each checkpoint now we would have to insert a > > "reason" clause. I think that's doable and in fact I think it is > > mandatory. Should this be a separate discussion about document > > structure and format? > [snip] > > This would, IMHO, be most welcome. There are a few check points I would > love to see the rational for! -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Monday, 30 October 2000 15:17:49 UTC