- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 11:19:27 -0500 (EST)
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- cc: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I vote yes and yes. Charles On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Kynn Bartlett wrote: Should we be concerned about the fact that newer versions of XHTML do not allow the author to capture information in the data model and instead relegate that to PF? (To play Al for a bit, it sounds like this is something WCAG should say 'yes, we're concerned about' and ask PF to bring up with XHTML WG.) Should we specifically urge that those functions within CSS which convey information (such as using ol/CSS to automatically number sections which might be referred to by that name) not be used? (Now -there's- a WCAG issue.) This would be a technology-specific technique for CSS under WCAG 2.0 plans. --Kynn -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia until 6 January 2001 at: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Sunday, 31 December 2000 11:20:23 UTC