- From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 18:34:55 +0200
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, "WAI" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I did something similar in CSS. But then someone from the W3C complained : ") I'm afraid that this does not constitute a valid conformance claim according to WCAG 1.0, which states: "Claims of conformance to this document must use one of the following two forms.." From 1: Specify a bunch of stuff. Form 2: Include, on each page claiming conformance, one of three icons provided by W3C and link the icon to the appropriate W3C ' explanation of the claim. Information about the icons and how to insert them in pages is available at [WCAG-ICONS]. I think that the CSS approach might be used in conjunction with form 1, but form 2 requires images made available by W3"C. " IN other words You have to use there icons. Text in images and all. Well hear is a nice catch 22 situation. If we come up with a good logo that is using mark up, we violate the criteria for conformance claim. However if we use the W3C logo, we violate WCAG itself. Now what? L -----Original Message----- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: Friday, December 29, 2000 5:21 PM Subject: Conformance Logo in Markup >Inspired by Kynn's excellent efforts to produce an XHTML/CSS version of the >WAI logo, I had a go myself:- >(not online yet). It uses tables for layout for a start, which is an >abomination, but it's less of an abomination than using text in images ;-) >Also, it makes sense when linearized, and it has the relavent summary and >titles. > >XHTML:- ><table cellspacing="0" > summary="WAI: WCAG 1.0 Level AA Conformance Assertion"> ><tr> ><td class="left"> > <div> > <a href="http://www.w3.org/" > title="The World Wide Web Consortium"><span > class="blue">W3</span><span > class="grey">C</span></a> > </div> ></td> ><td class="right"> > <div> > <a href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/" > title="Web Accessibility Initiative" > class="black">WAI</a>-<a > href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1AA-Conformance" > title="Explanation of Level AA WCAG 1.0 Conformance" > class="red">AA</a> > </div> > <div> > <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/" > title="Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Version 1.0" > class="darkgrey">WCAG 1.0</a> > </div> ></td> ></tr> ></table> > >CSS:- > >table { border:2px solid #a0a0a0;margin:0em; >padding:0em;font-family:arial;font-weight:bold; } >tr { padding:0em;margin:0em; } >table a { text-decoration: none; } >td { margin: 0em; } >td.left { background-color:#ffffff; padding:0.1em;font-size:0.95em; } >td.right { background-color:#ffdb8b;text-align:right;padding: > 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.7em;font-size: 0.7em; } >.blue { color: #00509f; } >.grey { color: #b0b0b8; } >.black { color: #000000; } >.red { color: #c00010; } >.darkgrey { color: #606080; } > >It's quite neat, but you may want to add further classes in case you have >more tables on your page that you don't want to be affected. > >Kindest Regards, >Sean B. Palmer >http://infomesh.net/sbp/ >"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." > - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07. > >
Received on Saturday, 30 December 2000 11:34:33 UTC