- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 12:39:40 -0700
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2000 15:40:36 UTC
At 03:17 PM 10/25/00 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >review this entire message. I got all the way through the message and have been following all the threads and suddenly realized (DUH!) we've been talking about WCAG 1.0. That document is a done deal and if we spend our time debating it (I understand that all we can do is "errata") we will fall behind in the much more important task of getting WCAG 2.0 to be a proposed recommendation. Even though the exchange will affect the latter, it's not focused on that. Other groups are totally dependent on "The Guidelines" and it is so clear that 2.0 will be a much more stable, useful underpinning for them that we'd best get on with it. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2000 15:40:36 UTC