Let's get back to work

At 03:17 PM 10/25/00 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>review this entire message.

I got all the way through the message and have been following all the 
threads and suddenly realized (DUH!) we've been talking about WCAG 1.0.

That document is a done deal and if we spend our time debating it (I 
understand that all we can do is "errata") we will fall behind in the much 
more important task of getting WCAG 2.0 to be a proposed recommendation. 
Even though the exchange will affect the latter, it's not focused on that. 
Other groups are totally dependent on "The Guidelines" and it is so clear 
that 2.0 will be a much more stable, useful underpinning for them that we'd 
best get on with it.

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE