- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:35:59 +1100 (EST)
- To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Thursday, 7 December, 2100 UTC (4 PM U.S. Eastern, 10 PM France, 8 AM Friday Eastern Australia), +1-617-252-1038: Agenda The main agenda item this week is to discuss the handling of "user agent capabilities" in the guidelines and/or techniques. Should we decide, and if so on what criteria, whether (1) particular access-related features of user agents have been implemented to the extent that content developers need no longer apply compensatory "work-around" techniques; and (2) whether particular specifications, technologies or features have been sufficiently implemented by user agents and/or adaptive technologies, thereby allowing content based upon them to be provided, without excluding, de facto, persons with disabilities? These two issues are closely related and, indeed, may be regarded as two perspectives from which to consider a single problem. Charles McCathieNevile has proposed two potential solutions: (1) to specify general criteria against which to assess the extent to which a given technology or feature has been implemented, for example "there must exist freely available implementations on all widely used operating systems"; or (2) to examine each web-related technology separately and to make a pragmatic decision with respect to it (which would, undoubtedly, need to be revised from time to time as the technology evolved). If time permits, we may also discuss checkpoint 6.3 (which was not fully treated at least week's meeting) and any other issues that participants would like to raise.
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2000 22:36:04 UTC