- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:16:28 -0400
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 11:24 AM 10/27/00 -0700, Kynn Bartlett wrote: >At 9:41 AM -0400 10/27/00, Leonard R. Kasday wrote: >>Also, please keep in mind that even when this "exception" applies, the >>author still has to provide an alternative version of the page that >>strictly follows the guideline, e.g. pure text in the icicle >>example. And if the exception doesn't apply, then even an alternative >>version doesn't suffice. > >What if you don't put the pure text version on a new page, but instead >put it on a different page? I don't understand the distinction you're making. The sentence you quote says "alternative", not New" or "different". Len -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Friday, 27 October 2000 15:15:05 UTC