Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0

Hmmm. I reckon that the proposed use is probably valid, according to the
specification.

I think something like "Use the HTML heading elements <code>h1</code>,
<code>h2</code>, ..." is better english expression.

I would try to keep the use of variables to examples of program code,
mathematics, and so on.

cheers

Charles McCN

On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Sean B. Palmer wrote:

  > I'm not convinced that this replacement is valid.  A better formulation
  > would be to state:  "Use the H1 to H6 elements".

  Or "Use the h1 to h6 elements", yes. What should <var> be used for then?

  Kindest Regards,
  Sean B. Palmer
  http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/swr/
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/
  "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
     - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
September - November 2000:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Thursday, 23 November 2000 08:45:05 UTC