- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:52:11 -0700
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 12:38 PM 10/26/2000 , Leonard R. Kasday wrote: >Would you point to a few examples of (1), use of classes and id's that would make it difficult to write third party stylesheets. I agree that's a serious problem, but I think I want to address it differently, and concrete examples may shorten the discussion (I hope :-) ). Well, here's a little test I just did. I took four sites with stylesheets which I personally have designed (which means that they follow similar principles and/or names for classes, which means they should be MORE compatible, not LESS compatible, than other sites): The Virtual Dog Show (http://www2.dogshow.com/), Idyll Mountain Internet (http://www.idyllmtn.com/), the HTML Writers Guild (http://www.hwg.org/), and my own personal site (http://kynn.com/). I then shuffled around the stylesheets to see what results. In some cases things were just fine; in others, they're inexplicably wrong. (At least, from the standpoint of an average user.) For example, some of the dogshow pages are green when they have other stylesheets applied, and some are not. All pages with a certain stylesheet -should- look the same, right? But they don't in many cases. You can see the experiment at http://kynn.com/working/styledemo/ -- the files are named <site>.<stylesheet>.html, or just <site>.html for the original CSS (for comparison's sake). The main thing to note here is _no reliablity_; it gets worse, not better, if you try this with stylesheets produced by different people for vastly different web sites. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Director of Accessibility, Edapta http://www.edapta.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/ What's on my bookshelf? http://kynn.com/books/
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2000 16:10:58 UTC