Re: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines?

I think it goes in the current 2.5 (note the discussion about 2.2 - 2.5 being
rewritten.)

It even says so in the second note for the checkpoint. (at least in the 28
September draft).

cheers

Charles McCN

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Loretta Guarino Reid wrote:

  This seems to address the abbreviation expansions. Do we think this is where lang belongs, too?
  	Loretta
  
  > Guideline 3. Design for ease of comprehension
  > 3.9 Define key terms and provide expansions for abbreviations and acronyms,
  > which should be identified using appropriate markup.
  > Note: only the first occurrence of an abbreviation or acronym occurring in a
  > document need be expanded. Expansion dictionaries, for instance in metadata,
  > may be provided as an alternative to an expansion in the text of a document.
  > 	Katie
  

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
September - November 2000: 
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Thursday, 12 October 2000 05:26:25 UTC