- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 09:25:06 -0500
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce_Bailey@ed.gov>, "'w3c-wai-gl@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Wendy A Chisholm'" <wendy@w3.org>
Hmmm. Speaking of small problems with the logo, presently the image has ALT="Level Double-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" Following the principle that ALT should be an equivalent for what the sighted person sees, would it not be better to have ALT="W3C: WAI triple A, WCAG 1.0." The longer description is an explanation that in principle is seen by everyone, so it should be the TITLE TITLE="Level Double-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" Len At 02:07 PM 12/26/00 -0500, Bailey, Bruce wrote: >I hesitate to bring it up, but there is also the issue that the official >versions have some flaws. There was the issues with .png files being served >instead of .gif (I think that's been resolved) and coming up blank with some >popular browsers. The WAI button don't use the "browser safe" palette and >are larger (in bit depth and pixel size) than they need to be. The WAI >conformance icons also don't match up nicely with the other W3C banner >buttons (the "W3C" portion is too small). Take a look at the bottom of the >W3C home page to see what I mean. It's been about a year since I first >pointed these picayune problems out. Any chance they will be fixed? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On > > Behalf Of Leonard R. Kasday > > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 3:13 PM > > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > > Subject: local copies of WAI logo > > > > > > Here's what I hope is a really simple question. > > > > The present conformance page > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1-Conformance.html > > > > says to > > reference the copy of the logo on the w3c servers > > > > <A href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1A-Conformance" > > title="Explanation of > > Level A Conformance"> > > <IMG height="32" width="88" > > src="http://www.w3.org/WAI/wcag1A" alt="Level A conformance > > icon, W3C-WAI > > Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0"></A> > > > > > > Is there any problem in simply coping the logo onto the page? > > In other > > words, the only difference would be to replace src with something like > > > > src="images/wcag1A.gif" > > > > which refers to the local copy on the site? > > > > Len -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Friday, 29 December 2000 09:25:17 UTC